CFG Recognition: Difference between revisions

From Algorithm Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
== Parameters ==  
== Parameters ==  


n: length of the given string
$n$: length of the given string
 
$|G|$: size of the grammar


== Table of Algorithms ==  
== Table of Algorithms ==  
Line 29: Line 31:


[[File:CFG Problems - CFG Recognition - Time.png|1000px]]
[[File:CFG Problems - CFG Recognition - Time.png|1000px]]
== Space Complexity Graph ==
[[File:CFG Problems - CFG Recognition - Space.png|1000px]]
== Space-Time Tradeoff Improvements ==
[[File:CFG Problems - CFG Recognition - Pareto Frontier.png|1000px]]


== Reductions FROM Problem ==  
== Reductions FROM Problem ==  

Latest revision as of 10:09, 28 April 2023

Description

Given a grammar $G$ and a string $s$, determine if the string $s$ can be derived by the grammar $G$.

Related Problems

Related: CFG Parsing

Parameters

$n$: length of the given string

$|G|$: size of the grammar

Table of Algorithms

Name Year Time Space Approximation Factor Model Reference
Cocke–Younger–Kasami algorithm 1968 G|)$ $O(n^{2})$ Exact Deterministic Time & Space
Valiant 1975 G|)$ where omega is the exponent for matrix multiplication $O(n^{2})$? Exact Deterministic Time

Time Complexity Graph

CFG Problems - CFG Recognition - Time.png

Reductions FROM Problem

Problem Implication Year Citation Reduction
k-Clique assume: k-Clique Hypothesis
then: there is no $O(N^{\omega-\epsilon}) time algorithm for target for any $\epsilon > {0}$
2017 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8104058 link
k-Clique assume: k-Clique Hypothesis
then: there is no $O(N^{\{3}-\epsilon}) time combinatorial algorithm for target for any $\epsilon > {0}$
2017 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8104058 link

References/Citation

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022000075800468