Triangle Detection: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Parameters == | == Parameters == | ||
n: number of | $n$: number of nodes | ||
m: number of edges | $m$: number of edges | ||
== Table of Algorithms == | == Table of Algorithms == | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| [[Disjunctive coBüchi Objectives]] || style="text-align:left;" | assume: Strong Triangle<br/>then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k\cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$-time algorithm for any $epsilon > {0}$ for generalized Büchi games. In particular, there is no such algorithm deciding whether the winning set is non-empty or deciding whether a specific vertex is in the winning set. || 2016 || https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.05850.pdf || [[Reduction from Triangle Detection to Disjunctive coBüchi Objectives|link]] | | [[Disjunctive coBüchi Objectives]] || style="text-align:left;" | assume: Strong Triangle<br/>then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k\cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$-time algorithm for any $epsilon > {0}$ for generalized Büchi games. In particular, there is no such algorithm deciding whether the winning set is non-empty or deciding whether a specific vertex is in the winning set. || 2016 || https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.05850.pdf || [[Reduction from Triangle Detection to Disjunctive coBüchi Objectives|link]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Disjunctive Queries | | [[Disjunctive Reachability Queries in MDPs]] || style="text-align:left;" | assume: Strong Triangle<br/>then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k \cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$ algorithm for any $\epsilon > {0}$ for target. The bounds holf for dense MDPs with $m=\Theta(n^{2})$ || 2016 || https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2933575.2935304 || [[Reduction from Triangle Detection to Disjunctive Reachability Queries in MDPs|link]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Disjunctive Queries of Safety in Graphs]] || style="text-align:left;" | assume: Strong Triangle<br/>then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k \cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$ algorithm, for any $\epsilon > {0}$ for disjunctive safety (objectives or queries) in graphs. || 2016 || https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2933575.2935304 || [[Reduction from Triangle Detection to Disjunctive Queries of Safety in Graphs|link]] | | [[Disjunctive Queries of Safety in Graphs]] || style="text-align:left;" | assume: Strong Triangle<br/>then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k \cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$ algorithm, for any $\epsilon > {0}$ for disjunctive safety (objectives or queries) in graphs. || 2016 || https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2933575.2935304 || [[Reduction from Triangle Detection to Disjunctive Queries of Safety in Graphs|link]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 08:27, 10 April 2023
Description
Determine whether or not there is a triangle in a given graph
Related Problems
Subproblem: Negative Triangle Detection, Nondecreasing Triangle, Minimum Triangle, Triangle in Unweighted Graph, Triangle Collection*
Related: Negative Triangle Search, Negative Triangle Listing, Nondecreasing Triangle, Minimum Triangle, Triangle in Unweighted Graph, Triangle Collection*
Parameters
$n$: number of nodes
$m$: number of edges
Table of Algorithms
Currently no algorithms in our database for the given problem.
Reductions TO Problem
Problem | Implication | Year | Citation | Reduction |
---|---|---|---|---|
Independent Set Queries | if: to-time: $O(n^{2} / \log^c n)$ to answer all subsequent batches of $\log n$ independent set queries from a graph that takes $O(n^k)$ time to preprocess for some $c,k > {0}$ then: from-time: $O(n^{3} / \log^{c+1} n)$ |
2018 | https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3186893, Theorem 6.5 | link |
Dynamic st-Reach | assume: SETH then: for any fixed constants $\epsilon > {0}$, $c_1,c_2 \in ({0},{1})$, on graphs with $n$ nodes $|S|=\tilde{\Theta}(n^{c_1})$, $|T|=\tilde{\Theta(n^{c_2})}$, $m=O(n)$ edges, and capacaties in $\{1,\cdots,n\}$, target cannot be solved in $O((|S|T|m)^{1-\epsilon})$ |
2014 | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6979028?casa_token=daaoBjrHUa4AAAAA:DCjk_WMWZ5Is6KvGpmS8a2bL9LskvV0P1zEG4U2u-Tm_C8sixu1w65OpTyjml1HEpaikXhtYsg | link |
Strong Connectivity (dynamic) | let $\gamma = (w-{1})/(w+{1}) \in ({1}/{3},{0.408})$ if: to-time: $O(m^{2\gamma-\epsilon})$ update and query times even after O(m^{1+\gamma-\epsilon}) preprocessing time for any $\epsilon > {0}$ then: Strong Triangle is false |
2014 | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6979028?casa_token=daaoBjrHUa4AAAAA:DCjk_WMWZ5Is6KvGpmS8a2bL9LskvV0P1zEG4U2u-Tm_C8sixu1w65OpTyjml1HEpaikXhtYsg | link |
Dynamic Bipartite Maximum-Weight Matching | let $\gamma = (w-{1})/(w+{1}) \in ({1}/{3},{0.408})$ if: to-time: $O(m^{2\gamma-\epsilon})$ update and query times even after O(m^{1+\gamma-\epsilon}) preprocessing time for any $\epsilon > {0}$ then: Strong Triangle is false |
2014 | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6979028?casa_token=daaoBjrHUa4AAAAA:DCjk_WMWZ5Is6KvGpmS8a2bL9LskvV0P1zEG4U2u-Tm_C8sixu1w65OpTyjml1HEpaikXhtYsg | link |
Disjunctive coBüchi Objectives | assume: Strong Triangle then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k\cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$-time algorithm for any $epsilon > {0}$ for generalized Büchi games. In particular, there is no such algorithm deciding whether the winning set is non-empty or deciding whether a specific vertex is in the winning set. |
2016 | https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.05850.pdf | link |
Disjunctive Reachability Queries in MDPs | assume: Strong Triangle then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k \cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$ algorithm for any $\epsilon > {0}$ for target. The bounds holf for dense MDPs with $m=\Theta(n^{2})$ |
2016 | https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2933575.2935304 | link |
Disjunctive Queries of Safety in Graphs | assume: Strong Triangle then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k \cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$ algorithm, for any $\epsilon > {0}$ for disjunctive safety (objectives or queries) in graphs. |
2016 | https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2933575.2935304 | link |