Bipartite Graph MCM: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Time Complexity | == Time Complexity Graph == | ||
[[File:Maximum Cardinality Matching - Bipartite Graph MCM - Time.png|1000px]] | [[File:Maximum Cardinality Matching - Bipartite Graph MCM - Time.png|1000px]] | ||
== Space Complexity | == Space Complexity Graph == | ||
[[File:Maximum Cardinality Matching - Bipartite Graph MCM - Space.png|1000px]] | [[File:Maximum Cardinality Matching - Bipartite Graph MCM - Space.png|1000px]] | ||
== Pareto | == Pareto Frontier Improvements Graph == | ||
[[File:Maximum Cardinality Matching - Bipartite Graph MCM - Pareto Frontier.png|1000px]] | [[File:Maximum Cardinality Matching - Bipartite Graph MCM - Pareto Frontier.png|1000px]] |
Revision as of 13:04, 15 February 2023
Description
The goal of maximum cardinality matching is to find a matching with as many edges as possible (equivalently: a matching that covers as many vertices as possible). Here, the graph is bipartite.
Related Problems
Generalizations: General Graph MCM
Subproblem: Planar Bipartite Graph Perfect Matching
Parameters
V: number of vertices
E: number of edges
Table of Algorithms
Name | Year | Time | Space | Approximation Factor | Model | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Micali and Vazirani | 1980 | $O(V^{0.5} E)$ | $O(V)$ | Deterministic | Time & Space | |
Ford–Fulkerson algorithm | 1956 | $O(VE)$ | $O(E)$ auxiliary | Exact | Deterministic | Time |
Hopcroft–Karp algorithm | 1973 | $O((V^{0.5})$E) | $O(V)$ auxiliary | Exact | Deterministic | Time |
Mucha; Sankowski (planar) | 2006 | $O(V^{(\omega/{2})$}) where omega is the exponent on matrix multiplication | $O(VlogV)$??? | Exact | Randomized | Time |
Madry's algorithm | 2013 | $O(E^{10/7}*polylog(V)$) | $O(E + V)$ | Exact | Deterministic | Time |
Chandran and Hochbaum | 2011 | $O(min(V*k, E)$+sqrt(k)*min(k^{2}, E)) | $O(E)$ auxiliary?? | Exact | Randomized | Time |
Time Complexity Graph
Space Complexity Graph
Pareto Frontier Improvements Graph
Reductions FROM Problem
Problem | Implication | Year | Citation | Reduction |
---|---|---|---|---|
OuMv | assume: OMv then: there is no algorithm for solving incremental (or decremental) maximum cardinality bipartite matching with amortized time $O(n^{1-\epsilon})$ per insertion (or deletion) and $O(n^{2-\epsilon})$ time per query for any $\epsilon > {0}$ |
2016 | https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.06705 | link |